documentation

Suki Alternative for Allergists: Breadth Versus Depth

2026-09-24 · 2 min read

By Pankaj Sabharwal · Co-founder, Medora

Suki is a capable product with an unusual pitch: ambient documentation plus a

voice assistant, across a very wide range of specialties. For a multi-specialty

group that wants one tool that behaves roughly the same in every clinic, that

breadth is the point.

An allergy practice should ask a different question: does the scribe

understand the parts of an allergy visit that other specialties never produce?

Breadth versus depth

A general scribe learns the conversation. It will write a clean note of

what was said in the room.

An allergy scribe also knows the work. In Medora, a skin-prick session is

held as structured results, immunotherapy and asthma follow-ups start from

prior-visit context, pertinent negatives are captured, and the SOAP note is

written for allergy, asthma and immunology rather than adapted to it.

Verification. Medora's Evidence Mapping ties supported lines of the note

to the transcript moment behind them, so a clinician can check a claim instead

of re-reading the visit. Every note is reviewed and signed by a clinician.

Buying. Suki is sold largely per user through sales conversations.

Medora's price is public — $99 a month — with a self-serve 7-day free trial.

If you need one assistant for many specialties, look closely at Suki. If

allergy is your whole day, the specialty depth is what saves the minutes: in

a 60-day pilot, provider sign-off on skin-test visits dropped from 18 minutes

Medora is built specifically for allergy, asthma and immunology practices,

with structured skin testing, prior-visit context and Evidence Mapping, at

$99 a month with a 7-day free trial.

Medora focuses on ambient documentation of the visit and clinician review of

the note, rather than voice commands.

Seven days, with nothing charged today. Start at medoramd.ai/pricing.